Yes, man. I probably sneaked this book
into the list because I remembered a conversation I had with my uni
housemate Emma years ago. We were discussing our enjoyment of Science Fiction
written in the 1950s or thereabouts, and how interesting it can be to
see what inventions the authors have trusted us with in the year
2000. She mentioned this book, which is more of a Dystopia, and how
she liked it because they also poke around a bit in her local
geography of Devizes and Marlborough.
Never did I expect it to be this
well-written. Or this creepy. I usually stay away from horror stories
and suchlike before bedtime (The Shadow over Innsmouth by H.P.
Lovecraft was impossible to read after 9 pm), because I have a very
active nightly imagination. And right enough, as I was carrying this
book with me through Finnmark (about as far north as you can go in
Norway), speaking Spanish with my Nicaraguans and Mexicans along the
way, and only reading it during the quiet hours before bedtime, I
have had so many strange dreams. There have been people that wanted
rescuing. There have been strange dystopian places where people,
including me, have had to trust complete strangers on their word, and
ask beggars for their food. I even think my dream a few nights before
I finished the book, about one lady wanting to commit suicide, and
later on a group of teenagers wanting the same thing, come from this
book.
WARNING: SLIGHT SPOILERSBecause
right from the beginning, some twelve pages into the story, we have
suicides. There are plenty of people who can't handle being suddenly
blind, or who realise what a struggle there will be to survive, and
choose another way out. My dream was incredibly disturbing, and I am
choosing to believe it had with all the occurrences of suicides in
the book, because I don't want to believe it has anything to do with
anyone else.
"It
must be, I thought, one of the race's most persistent and comforting
hallucinations to trust that 'it can't happen here' – that one's
own little time and place is beyond cataclysms."
p.86
What makes this
book so potent and convincing is the straight forward language that
Wyndham uses. Even on the first page does he talk about the end of
the world. He has a brilliant way of mixing information about what
has happened and will happen with seemingly random descriptions of
his surroundings. Even many of these have a value later in the book,
either as plot points or just as groundwork for what will come. Much
of the smaller details make the book so much more likely.
Like how the press uses several tentative names for the triffids,
such as trigons, trilogs, trinits, and trippets, all
"near-scientific", or "quasi-etymological". Like
they always do.
There are also
plenty of corners marked in this book, as you will see from the
quotes dotted around this review. Of course it is a commentary on how
we've developed our society with too many machines, not knowing where
anything is made or how, not relying on nature and so on. The plants
are taking over. More intriguing is that this book was written more
than sixty years ago, and this problem – our distance from the
actual world – is just getting bigger.
"...the
amount we did not know and did not care to know about our daily lives
is not only astonishing, but somehow a bit shocking. I knew
practically nothing, for instance, of such ordinary things as how my
food reached me, where the fresh water came from, how the clothes I
wore were woven and made, how the drainage of cities kept them
healthy."
p.16
I still don't know
half of this.
There were no
characters I sympathised with very much, except for the protagonist
of course, because he is most the only character we get to follow for
a long while. I did however project other people onto the characters
in the book. Juan writes a little like John, or Bill, therefore they
are the same person. Josella is in fact Erica Jong, who in her turn
is of course Isadora Wing. Coker is the character I would have liked
to see more of, to turn him from your standard engaged representant
for the working class (I will give you my favourite of these: Mr
Higgins in North and South by Elizabeth Gaskell) into a someone I am
glimpsing underneath.
Mr Thornton and Mr Higgins, the best video I could find
Josella
suffers from a similar problem to Coker's – she's borderline
stereotype. Of course the first non-blind girl -nay, person - the
protagonist meets is very good-looking, three or four inches shorter
than him, blonde, although not too blonde, strong, and definitely
middle class. Who had a short teenage rebellion before going back to
her safe family home. Please, Mr Wyndham.
But
still. All the moral questions! This book is so intriguing. Will you
help a larger amount of people for some time, or a smaller amount of
people for a longer time? There is actually some very sad research,
also known as cold logic, that our charity funds would be spent
better if we helped a few children throughout their lives, instead of
giving nutrition packs to millions and millions of them, which will
last one month. But we can't do that. How would you choose the
children? So we/NGOs/the state is/are always Coker in the beginning
of the book.
I
could write the longest review yet, even though Fear of Flying seemed
more important to me than this book. There are themes of divisions of
class, and how different classes form after a disaster. There are
also supposedly radical ideas of free love, while the underlying
message seems to be that we must all be man and wife living together.
There are supposedly some ideas that men and women are equal, but
when it comes to it, the man works outside, doing the hunting and
gathering of materials, while the women stay inside to cook, sew, and
repair. Then again, we are in the fifties. Then again, Wyndham
shouldn't pretend he's being radical and new when he's really not.
Maybe he believed he was.
"'You
know perfectly well that women can do – or rather did – handle
the most complicated and delicate machines when they took the trouble
to understand them. What generally happens is that they're too lazy
to take the trouble unless they have to.'"
p.175
"'You
are Josella Playton, author of -'
'You're quite wrong,' she interrupted him, firmly. 'I'm Josella Mason, author of "David Masen".'"
'You're quite wrong,' she interrupted him, firmly. 'I'm Josella Mason, author of "David Masen".'"
p.253
There
is also the shortly mentioned, but slightly frightening, idea that
most people need to be herded, because they are not intelligent
enough to know their own good.
Why did we include
the soundtrack in "how to write a review"? I seriously
never listen to music while I am reading. If I hear it, I'm not
listening.
My favourite quote
to finish this rambling review:
"The word was
'when', but the tone was 'if'."
p.207
*This edition: 1974, Penguin Books, Middlesex, England
I'm not going to argue that Wyndham isn't pretentious in trying to be "radical" whilst holding very patriarchal views on society, but I do have to concede that he leaves enough room for change: Josella might well be a stereotypical damsel in distress (that was also my first thought when Bill "rescues" her from her captor at the beginning), but she's not necessarily utterly helpless.
SvarSlettI also thought she had a bit of Isadora in her, and though she might constantly have the lower hand in her conversations with Bill, she still had enough sense to free herself from the (literal) shackles that Coker had imposed on her, almost without trouble.
Bill also has a constant talk about adapting oneself to the situation, but could hardly be said to change much himself - after all, he does spend the whole novel chasing the same girl that he wanted to screw from the beginning.
But let's zoom out a little bit, and we find that the only child (we've seen) growing up in this world, is a tough little 8 year old (more or less?) girl, firing a freakin' flamethrower at the god-forsaken plants that want to take over her home!
Short reply:
SvarSlettI think Wyndham chose a girl as his child survivor that kills triffids because it would be MORE SHOCKING and make more of an impression on his readers that a GIRL could become such an avenger. In addition to that, during the last chapters (WARNING SPOILERY SPOILERS) when the years pass by, as she becomes a teenager and, I guess, about 15-16, she starts helping more in the house, as she and Josella figure out how to cook and do housework from reading a book. This is presented as a good thing.
This is true... Come to think about it, I believe it had that shocking effect on me, because she strongly resembles a video-game character that I very much sympathise with - significantly more of a badass and independent anti-heroine, actually.
SvarSlett